Tips and Considerations for Virtual Negotiation.jpg

Tips and Considerations for Negotiating Virtually: Part One

Published: Jul 21 , 2020
Author: Elizabeth Lewis

Though video conferencing has been in existence for some time now, with the current global pandemic turning the world upside down in terms needing to practice social distancingrestrictions on travel and more people working from home – there has been a significant increase in virtual meetings and online negotiation. 

 

Here at Scotwork, we also recently launched our virtual negotiation training and online consulting services which include deal preparation workshops, pressure testing and negotiating on behalf of our clients. 

 

With this in mind, we’ve collated a number of key considerations and tips from our consultants which augment our 8 step negotiation framework, giving you the best chance of achieving win-win negotiation outcomes when negotiating virtually. 

 

How do you read the room? On Zoom. 

Keith Stacey 

I asked a friend recently how he was coping with social isolation.  

 

“I have never been more efficient,” he proclaimed enthusiastically. “All those meetings I used to attend are now on Zoom:  no commuting, no looking for parking, so much more efficient. I’m getting twice as much done.”  

 

Commentators are seeing work from home (WFH) as becoming a permanent feature of the economy when all restrictions are lifted.  Currently 15% of the workforce is able to work from home and this is predicted to rise to 30% post pandemic. 

 

Of course one of the key enablers of working from home are the video conferencing apps Zoom, Skype, Teams and Google Hangouts. There has been an explosion in their use for meetings, catchups and negotiations. If the trend continues, face-to-face meetings could become a rarity.  However a word of caution is necessary. Some of these applications have been available for years and their promoters have predicted a decline in both domestic and international travel through use of video conferencing. Prior to the current pandemic this has never happened. People have still felt the need to meet face to face even if it involves arduous travel. They did this for good reason as Zoom and the others have a number of shortcomings inherent in this technology. 

 

The complexity of person-to-person communication is the defining feature of human progress. It is estimated that up to 55% of meaning gleaned, is non-verbal. It is what we see added to, what we hear that makes successful communication. Kate Murphy the author of You’re Not Listening: What You Are Missing and Why It Matters has written about the shortcomings that are implicit in video conferencing technologies.  

 

Encoding and decoding processes produce images which are distorted-smoothed, blurred and often out of sync with audio. Some of these changes we are not even conscious of, but they confuse us and the brain strains to compensate and fill in the “missing bits.” As a result we feel fatigued and vaguely dissatisfied.  

 

Another weakness is that all important eye contact, so influential in building trust, is absent. People are looking upwards, downwards or sideways depending on their video setup. As a result they appear less trustworthy and shifty. Murphy reports that in the legal system video depositions, hearings and trials may be unfair for this reason alone.  

 

The other problem is that when on a conference call, there is a tendency to look at ourselves (surprise) rather than the other participants. If we add the security issues that have been exposed and the distractions of the home office: barking dogs, demanding toddlers and the attempt to multitask (still present face to face but more obvious) the limitations become apparent. 

 

The gaps in audio in the transmission also breach the conversational rule of no gap no overlap reports the Economist. The longer pauses between speakers than would occur in a face-to-face conversation make speakers appear less trustworthy. The tendency for speakers to talk over each other and the time it takes to resolve these interruptions also causes frustration and fatigue. Fuzzy reception and foreign accents can also make it more difficult to understand some speakers and this increases distrust. In some cases it may be better to use a more traditional means of communication – the telephone. 

 

While the trend to the video communication is irreversible, an awareness of these limitations will enable the tools to be used more effectively as a supplement to the relationship and trust building face-to-face meeting we have practiced throughout our evolution as a species. 

 

Invest in Quality Technology  

Louis Werth and Jacob Hall 

It cannot be understated the importance of having quality technology which is stable. The obvious limitations of virtual communication which are mentioned above are often compounded by technology issues such as poor internet connection, broken microphones, and grainy camera footage. Our best advice above all else it to test your technology BEFORE the meeting! This minimises frustration and wasted time on the call. Nobody wants to be THAT person who can’t get their camera working while everybody else waits! 

 

  • A key factor in establishing a quality video conference is the utilisation of high-speed internet. As we run our virtual programs there, our Sydney office is capable of some tantalising speeds. However, for those working from home remotely this might not be a reality. As a rule of thumb anything above 15MBPS download and 10MBPS upload will produce the cleanest sound and clearest video with minimal to no lag in sharing and talking. Try negotiating with your internet provider or your company to what can be done to optimise your internet speed!  

 

  • Built in camera technology has come a long way, however PC and Mac cameras can fall short in delivering clear, quality images. Our advise is to Invest in a high-quality external webcam (If you can find one – as there has been a bit of a worldwide shortage!). At Scotwork Australia, we use Razor Kiyo webcams for our PC users and Logitech Webcams for our consultants who are using Apple devices.  

 

  • Some of our recent courses have also highlighted the importance of a decent microphone. It is difficult to negotiate a deal when you can’t clearly hear what the other part is saying. This can sometimes come down to loud background noises but can also be due to a subpar mic/headset. We recommend testing your microphone (and all your equipment) BEFORE you enter the negotiation.  

 

Please check out our blog next week for part two of tips and considerations for negotiating virtually. 

 

Until then, happy negotiating!


SHARE

2018 Elizabeth 432

About the author:

Elizabeth Lewis
Elizabeth develops, co-ordinates and maintains the vehicles and tools which reflect Scotwork Australia’s identity as the world-leader in negotiation training and advisory services. She is thus responsible for Scotwork’s branding and collateral, marketing communications, digital marketing and social media.

Read more about Elizabeth Lewis

More posts by Elizabeth Lewis

Latest Blog:

Tips and Considerations for Negotiating Virtually: Part Two

Negotiating over a webcam is not the same as face to face. Our overall advice is to slow the pace down, be deliberate with the words and information you provide and be concise. The main game here is to convey the relevant information to get the point across. If the software you’re using has screen sharing capabilities, take advantage of this and use this to demonstrate the relevant information!

Latest Tweet:

Scotwork Negotiation Australia
Level 17 / Suite 2, 25 Bligh Street
Sydney
2000
Australia
02 9211 3999
info@scotwork.com.au
Follow us
Scotwork CPD 2020