Negotiating With Bullies

Published: Jan 31 , 2013
Author: Gaëtan Pellerin

When facing a bully in negotiation, should you behave the same way?

Each of us has encountered this type of negotiator: A customer who threatens to give your business to a competitor if you don't give in to what he or she wants. A family member or close friend who behaves as a victim, playing the guilt card. Or an angry boss when the outcome is not what he or she expected.

If we had the choice, we'd like to avoid this type of interaction. But in most cases, we don't have that luxury.

When we're under pressure, competiveness and aggressiveness sometimes take over. Our brain works as a tunnel and we go back to our natural style. Because emotions and tensions rise, we tend to defend our point of view, persuade and argue, making it very difficult to negotiate a solution that works for both parties.

If you face a bully negotiator, be prepared. Understand your needs and limits so you can resist the temptation to accept a bad deal under pressure.  Find out why those on the other party behave like that by acknowledging and understanding the issues to which they're emotionally involved. Once these clear up, ask good questions to uncover their true concerns. Try to act as a consultant to understand their reality.

When it's time to package and re-package the proposal, be creative to suit the needs of those on the other side on your terms. They might throw irritant factors in the equation. But don't get emotional.  They're suspicious by nature.

So next time you face a bully negotiator, don't forget that competitive stances breed competitive stances, making it less likely that you'll get access to their needs, interests and inhibitions.

Remember people negotiate because they have an interest - even bullies.

Gaëtan Pellerin, Scotwork North America


SHARE

blogAuthor

About the author:

Gaëtan Pellerin
No bio is currently avaliable

Latest Blog:

The Ultimate Game Theory Strategy

‘The Prisoners’ Dilemma’ is a popular game theory example involving a two-person game of strategic interaction. One version is as follows. Two prisoners are accused of a crime. If one confesses and the other does not, the one who confesses will be released immediately and the other will spend 20 years in prison. If neither confesses, each will be held for only a few months. If both confess, they each spend 15 years in prison. This creates a paradox in decision analysis in which two individuals acting in their own self-interest do not produce the optimal outcome...

Latest Tweet:

Scotwork Negotiation Australia
Level 17 / Suite 2, 25 Bligh Street
Sydney
2000
Australia
02 9211 3999
info.au@scotwork.com
Follow us
Scotwork CPD 2020