Transparency is a Non-Negotiable.jpg

Building Trust Through Transparency

Published: Nov 16 , 2017
Author: Jared Bamford

With the exponential growth in technology and the implications of that for the media industry, significant changes to the media landscape shaped by the duopoly of Google and Facebook are presenting media buying agencies with new challenges. Traditional advertising, along with traditional set commissions are being replaced by an increasing move towards digital advertising and incentives in the form of rebates-a highly debated and contentious current topic in the media world. 


Arvind Hinkman writes in Adnews, The Association of National Advertisers (ANA) commissioned report found pervasive media rebates and non-transparent business practices in the US media buying ecosystem, and that agencies made media planning decisions that were not always in the best interest of clients. 


The US has strict laws banning media rebates, but in Australia the practice is legal provided there is full disclosure to clients. 


Competitive pressures are being placed upon media buying agencies where clients are driving down costs and agencies are positioned to have to look at alternative ways to create profit. In addition, they are receiving negative publicity for gaining from rebates and variable, unclear commission arrangements with media owners, as well as a lack of transparency with clients because of complex fee structures. 


Adnews references the CEO of an independent agency who speaks about a “blame game” where much finger-pointing between agencies and clients around hidden agendas of the former and unreasonable demands from the latter result in the media buyers funding an unsustainable and “inherently unstable” system. 


The CEO argues further that while clients should insist on transparency, they also need to know that their agency “is profitable and able to sustain itself long term”. 


Teaching Scotwork courses I’ve observed many people are reluctant to share information, they hold the misconception that information is power and therefore best to keep it close to the chest.  


Perhaps with more disclosure of information within the current media buying landscape they’d avoid the “smoke and mirrors” accusations and therefore the extent of negative publicity. Once more, being transparent with information will only build reciprocity and gain trust, both of which are critical for long term relationships. 


Jared 432.jpg

About the author:

Jared Bamford
Jared’s background is in sales and marketing, working in a range of industries including manufacturing, health and fitness, telecommunications and events.

Read more about Jared Bamford

More posts by Jared Bamford

Latest Blog:

Negotiating Lessons from the Banking Royal Commission

The Australian Banking Royal Commission has been quite embarrassing with cover-ups, poor conduct and unethical treatment of customers. But it does bring to light key lessons for negotiators. These lessons are particularly true for those who are perceived to hold the balance of power. In other words, if you are negotiating with someone who is seen to have very little power - there is a high chance your actions will come under public scrutiny at some point. It is highly unlikely the banking industry will be the only one to come under scrutiny. All you need to do to come to this conclusion is read the paper to see similar accusations in industries like retail/grocery buying, leasing, franchising, etc.

Latest Tweet:

Scotwork Australia
210/410 Elizabeth Street
Surry Hills
02 9211 3999
Follow us